The cross-network Bill of Rights and Responsibilities for HIV Research document provides a short list of the rights and responsibilities for participants in a clinical trial. The purpose of this document is to help research participants act on their own behalf and in partnership with study staff. Rights and responsibilities listed in the document are in no particular rank order. This document was developed by the Community Partners Bill of Rights and Responsibilities Working Group for use by sites, at their discretion, along with informed consent forms. Feel free to share this resource with collaborators both within and outside the HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials Networks.
Community Partners developed a Community Engagement Resources document highlighting some of the resources available to support community engagement in HIV research.
This guidance document highlights a number of different practices that can facilitate gender-inclusiveness in study protocol design, data collection, and data reporting across the networks, and provides needed context and direction to support these efforts.
A Long-Acting Antiretroviral Injectables (LAARVI) Information Sheet was developed on behalf of Legacy to provide general information about LAARVIs.
Language can empower, but it can also perpetuate stigma, and as studies continue to bear out, stigma exacerbates the HIV epidemic. While many factors that contribute to stigma are entrenched and systemic, NIAID officials have the immediate power and opportunity to improve language and lead by example. This guide includes language suggestions for communicating about HIV and related topics.
Community Partners and the TB Community Research Advisors Group (CRAG) have developed two resources to help index cases/participants and site staff talk about the PHOENix study.
The world of clinical trials research is highly regulated, with an array of documents guiding the conduct of clinical trials research. Policy documents and procedural guidelines, such as Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP), cover most aspects of clinical research but none of these documents discuss standards for engaging community in the research process.
Community representatives working with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at the NIH increasingly felt that this type of guidance was essential and in 2009 sought to develop recommendations as a way to address good community practice. These recommendations were updated in 2014, and again in 2020, to help research staff and community representatives expand and deepen existing partnerships, and forge new ones, with the ultimate goal of facilitating effective community engagement in all aspects of clinical trials research.
Recommendations for Community Engagement in HIV/AIDS Research Version 3.0
Recommendations for Community Engagement in HIV/AIDS Research Version 3.0 Portuguese Translation
Recommendations for Community Engagement in HIV/AIDS Research Version 3.0 Spanish Translation
As part of the mandate from DAIDS to work with other disease groups, Community Partners (CP) and the TB Community Research Advisors Group (CRAG) are collaborating and working together on a joint TB/HIV project. The Community Research Advisors Group is an international, community-driven advisory body that works to ensure the meaningful representation and engagement of affected communities in research conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Tuberculosis Trials Consortium. This group of research-literate activists supports a robust, comprehensive and innovative TBTC research agenda that is responsive to community needs as well as scientific priorities.
One goal of the CP/CRAG partnership is to help educate TB community members and researchers about HIV and to help educate HIV community members and researchers about TB and how the two diseases are connected.